Gurgi, no!

I’ve been carried a little too far afield in my talk of classic Japanese arthouse cinema and contemporary American literature, so let’s change the topic to something a little more germane to the blog: something bad that Disney animation studios did in the 80s. By which I mean The Black Cauldron, a movie which was supposed to be a prestige project, but very quickly devolved into one of those long, soul-crushing production hells that deflate themselves into movie theaters before getting swept under the rug. There’s a not unlikely chance that you, the person reading this post, had no idea this movie existed until now.

The Black Cauldron is adapted from Lloyd Alexander’s series of fantasy novels, The Chronicles of Prydain, which I have not read but am willing to believe is probably of far greater artistic merit than this movie. The movie follows this one kid called Taran, who is tasked with watching over a magic pig called Hen Wen. How magical? Well, Hen Wen has the ability to reveal the location of the Black Cauldron, an evil artifact which is being sought after by the eeeevil Horned King who wishes to use it to raise an army of the undead. Unfortunately Taran is too much of an airhead for this sort of thing and hence loses Hen Wen within the first 15 minutes or so of the movie, forcing him to go on a Hero’s Journey involving a princess and an old guy and some annoying comic relief characters.

The movie’s chief failure is its lack of details such as “compelling characters” and “story”. I don’t think I’m doing the cast a disservice by saying that the description I’ve thus given of them adequately sums them up. And as for the plot, well it felt like things just kinda happened for 80 minutes or so until the bad guy was dead and the credits were rolling, with very little of the connective tissue explaining what was going on, who these people were, or why I should care.

That said, I had a good time. The Black Cauldron is a bad movie, but very much the sort I can get down with.

For one thing, in spite of some uneven character animation, the movie overall is quite beautiful: this was an expensive movie, and one of only two animated Disney movies made in Panavision, and it shows in the lushness of its imagery. It feels like vintage Disney animation in a way that other features from the same era do not.

But it’s also so tonally bizarre: this is the one animated Disney flick that is really trying hard to be another Star Wars while also keeping its foot in the door of its own traditions while also filling it with a lot of rather grim and ghoulish sword and sorcery stuff (this was long before the more elegant solution of simply purchasing Lucasfilm was a viable option). The end product feels like Disney decided to animate someone’s Dungeons & Dragons campaign, and isn’t that just an exciting recipe for fascinatingly bad cinema?

There’s a certain perverse entertainment in watching this beast which should not exist, especially given how the sort of streamlined quality control we see from the company nowadays prevents a spectacular misfire like this from ever seeing the light of day. Which is probably better for the sanity of the people who work on these things, but I dunno: I’ve never had a desire to see the likes of Frozen or Moana more than once, while I can see myself returning to this cauldronwell in the future.

About Josh W

Scribbler and doodler
This entry was posted in pop culture and its discontents and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Gurgi, no!

  1. T. Martin says:

    This one’s been in my “I’ll remember to remember it eventually” watchlist, if only for its animation.

  2. T. Martin says:

    Finally remembered to remember it and watched it; cool in parts, but…bland. Just bland.

  3. Gaheret says:

    I liked it, yet. The actual Cronichles of Prydain are better in a lot of ways, but I still liked the, I don’t know, primal, tone of the story and the characters (they have faces and names, but they could as well be anonymous). It feels like a convoluted Welsh tale full of horror, magic objects and clumsy wonders much like the Sleeping Beauty feels like the sophisticated french art of the autumn of the Middle Ages (it’s almost tapestry-like) or Snow White feels German and Grimm above all, always surrounded by the enigmatic forest in which everything can happen. And shares with these two a villain much more primal and horrible than the character who inspired him in the book (which, I repeat, is better as a novel and as a mistery and has an elaborated Welsh mythology and fleshed out characters), and maybe only Maleficient and the Queen are so terrifying in Disney.

    In my view, Disney gradually losed the myth (Cinderella might have been the work of transition) but at first was able to keep something like good, abridged fantasy novels with some mythological elements (The Lion King, Peter Pan, Aladdin and The Hunback on Notre Dame). Recently, they have given their full attention to characters, two or three. So their works are approaching drama plays, which are usually less interesting and suggestive than fantasy tales, and much less than myths.

    In my view, their version of a New Orleans Princess and Toad, maybe other work of transition, counts as the beggining of a mostly uninteresting era.

    • Josh W says:

      I think there’s something to be said for a sort of primal storytelling being Disney’s strong suit. The tone of their more recent stuff is, as you say, more character focused, and also somewhat didactic. That’s likely due to the influence of Pixar, which specializes in those kinds of stories, but which I don’t find works as well with the more classically oriented Disney (ditto for 3D animation)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s