Tolkienesque meditations

With the upcoming semester only a few days away, I have been doing what many geeky Catholics do for refreshment of spirit: re-read Tolkien. I finished The Hobbit yesterday, and completed Book One of The Lord of the Rings about an hour ago. Some miscellaneous thoughts:

– Tolkien, more than any popular writer I can think of, has been something of a slow-burner for me. When I first started reading him as an adolescent, I found his stories and worldbuilding interesting and moving, but unfortunately told with a rather dry, Donnish cough. In comparison, people like J.K. Rowling and Stephen King were cases of love at first sight. It took time for me to see the merits of his style (which is actually far more economical than most people give him credit for) and of what seemed at the time to be his very quaint, old fashioned worldview.

– I knew for a long time that he was a veteran of World War I, which killed most of his friends. But it took reading some of his letters to see glances of some of the suffering, alienation and anguish he went through, even as an older man, in spite of his often hobbitish aura. But this is true for all of us – we all have more profound wounds than are often visible to others. The glimpses into his prayer life are also moving:

Out of the darkness of my life, so much frustrated, I put before you the one great thing to love on earth: the Blessed Sacrament….There you will find romance, glory, honour, fidelity, and the true way of all your loves upon earth, and more than that: Death: by the divine paradox, that which ends life, and demands the surrender of all, and yet by the taste (or foretaste) of which alone can what you seek in your earthly relationships (love, faithfulness, joy) be maintained, or take on that complexion of reality, of eternal endurance, which every man’s heart desires.

– The Hobbit is a children’s book, but I can think of some reasons for why if it were published today it would cause a minor moral panic – too violent, too scary, too much smoking and drinking, (heck, it even makes a rather memorable joke about decapitation and golf) etc. The Hobbit is not a safe book, but it is unsafe in almost all the right ways. We will meet pitiful, dangerous people like Gollum, and sadistic tyrants like Smaug. The real thing is often far more frightening than these creatures, but, to paraphrase Chesterton, the value of these stories lies not in telling us that dragons exist, but in telling us that they can be overcome. Tellingly, I don’t think I’ve ever heard of a school that includes The Hobbit on its curriculum. Part of that is likely the old Genre Fiction Is Not Serious Lit attitude. But the paranoid crank in me would like to see this as another example of how elementary school and high school are systematically designed to stifle your child’s imagination, moral or otherwise.

– No, I will not allow myself to go on a bitter rant about elementary school and high school here.

– The society of the hobbits is very conservative and borderline anarchic (political offices are for the most part limited to the honor of the title). Of course, it is also a pre-industrial, pre-capitalist society. As has been mentioned a couple of times on this blog, I tend to view both capitalism and the modern state with a high degree of cynicism and suspicion, while not really seeing how they can be done away with either; I am also doubtful of all the idealistic schemes on offer. Reading the early chapters of LOTR reminds me that I should take more time to understand better where the anarcho-monarchists, distributists, et al. are actually coming from. Tolkien himself seemed to venture in that direction a bit.

– There is a parallel universe where Hayao Miyazaki directed The Hobbit movie. Maybe one of its inhabitants can lend me a DVD.

About Josh W

Scribbler and doodler
This entry was posted in Catholicism, Tolkien and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Tolkienesque meditations

  1. Pingback: Today’s quote | Zoopraxiscope Too

  2. jubilare says:

    Here’s to Hobbits. 🙂
    Something that has been stirring in me, lately, spurred on my the recent films, is recognition of how much The Hobbit and LotR are underdog stories… stories where the most important people are the ones no one (or almost no one) takes seriously. It’s not the great heroes and wizards that save the world, but small, scared, ordinary folk. That’s one of the major reasons the “Hobbit” movies anger me. They seem to miss the whole point of Bilbo.

  3. Melinda Selmys says:

    I you ever find that DVD, I want it. And my children will chop off limbs to get it — with or without my consent 🙂

  4. Actually, a lot of the Ghibli folks worked on the Rankin-Bass Hobbit. Your wish has been partially granted. Here you go:

    “Rankin/Bass’ “Animagic” stop-motion productions, as well as many of their animated productions, were animated in Japan. Throughout the 1960s, the Animagic productions were headed by Japanese stop-motion animator Tadahito Mochinaga. Starting with Frosty the Snowman, MAD Magazine artist Paul Coker was the main art director.

    “Many of Rankin/Bass’ traditionally cel-animated works were animated by the Japanese studio Top Craft, which was formed in 1972 as an offshoot of the legendary studio Toei Animation. Many Top Craft staffers, including the studio’s founder Toru Hara (who was credited in some of Rankin/Bass’ specials), would go on to join Studio Ghibli and work on Hayao Miyazaki’s feature films, including Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind and My Neighbor Totoro.”

    • More info, this time from the Wikipedia entry on the Rankin-Bass Hobbit:

      “Principal artists included coordinating animator Toru Hara; supervising animator/character designer Tsuguyuki Kubo; character and effects animators Hidetoshi Kaneko and Kazuko Ito; and background designer Minoru Nishida. The same studio and crew members were also used for The Return of the King.”

  5. Anyway, that moment when Bilbo climbs the tree and sees the butterflies over Mirkwood is pretty clearly a Miyazaki moment.

    But given what Miyazaki did to his otherwise excellent adaptations of Wynne Jones’ book Howl’s Moving Castle (ie, “I reject your plot and ending and substitute my own! Also, we need bombers and a remake of Laputa!”), I’m not sure we would have liked him adapting The Hobbit.

    • Josh W says:

      eenteresting. I watched the Rankin-Bass movie as a kid, but didn’t know about this. The tree climbing moment is actually the one thing I still vividly recall from it (well, along with Gollum’s frog man look and the rather hammy Great Goblin).

      I’ve never read or seen Howl’s Moving Castle and so don’t have an opinion on it one way or the other.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s